It is teristic of Poetry t its materials are tobe found in every subject  t is to be soug in tings of Critics,but in ts themselves.

    ty of to be considered as experiments.tten co ascertain ion in ty is adapted totic pleasure. Readers accustomed to ters, if t in readingto its conclusion, rugglerangeness and aukry, and o enquire by esy ttempts can be permitted to assume t title. It is desirable tsuc suffer tary ry, a ed meaning, to stand in ti?cation; but t, ains a natural delineation of ers, and s; and if to t t to be pleased in spiteof t most dreadful enemy to our pleasures, our oablishedcodes of decision.

    Readers of superior judgment may disapprove of tyle in  must be expected t many lines andp exactly suit taste. It   fault of times descended too lo many of oo familiar, and not of suf?cient dignity. It is appre t ters, and imes ing manners andpassions, ts of to make.

    An accurate taste in poetry, and in all ts, Sir Josalent, inued intercourse  modelsof composition. tioned not oprevent t inexperienced reader from judging for merely to temper to suggest t if poetrybe a subject on o maybe erroneous, and t in many cases it necessarily will be so.

    tale of Goody Blake and icated fact  may be proper to say t te inventions of ts ion or t of  supposed to be spoken in ter of tor ly sself in tory. t Marinere ten in imitation of tyle_, as of ts; but ions, t ted in it elligible for t centuries. titledExpostulation and Reply, and t ofconversation  unreasonably attacomodern books of moral philosophy.